Tax Reform and the Investment Case for Key Holdings

 Hennessy Focus Fund Portfolio Managers discuss the potential impact of the Tax Reform bill and share updates and their investment case for a number of key Fund holdings. They also provide their market outlook for the coming year. 

February 2018
  • David Rainey
    David Rainey, CFA
    Co-Portfolio Manager
  • Brian Macauley
    Brian Macauley, CFA
    Co-Portfolio Manager
  • Ira Rothberg
    Ira Rothberg, CFA
    Co-Portfolio Manager

How might the recent Tax Reform bill affect the Fund’s holdings?

We believe that overall the Fund’s holdings will benefit from the Tax Reform bill. Many of the holdings have a domestically-oriented business that in 2017 paid a higher tax rate than the average rate paid by the companies in the S&P 500 Index. We expect, all other things being equal, that the cut in the corporate tax rate should boost earnings for the Fund as a whole by about 10% in 2018.

Would you please discuss one of the Fund’s recent investments and why you find it attractive?

In 2017, we added NVR, Inc., a U.S.-based homebuilder that constructs new single-family homes and attached townhouses. The company operates in 14 East Coast states, with a concentration in the Baltimore-Washington D.C. region. NVR has a unique business model that has enabled it to earn a return on equity nearly twice that of typical homebuilders. In contrast to its peers, NVR outsources land ownership and development to partners, reducing its capital intensity and allowing it to focus on efficiently constructing and selling homes. It simplifies the complexity of the homebuilding process by manufacturing components offsite and limiting home design options. And it seeks market share leadership at the local level to leverage its overhead cost and negotiate the best terms with vendors.

We believe the U.S. homebuilding industry has a favorable outlook. The industry is producing 30% fewer homes than it has on average over the last 50 years, so we believe it has only partly rebounded from the Great Recession and should continue to recover. Additionally, with only 2% market share nationally, NVR has plenty of room to grow its share of the homebuilding industry.

We believe it is difficult to replicate NVR’s business model, and no competitor to date has succeeded. As a result, we believe NVR has many years of market share gains and strong returns ahead of it. NVR’s management team remains well-incentivized; the CEO and Chairman each own more than $150 million of NVR stock.

O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., after years of great performance, had a weak 2017. What are the prospects for the company in your opinion?

After compounding at about 20% annually from 2005 to 2016, shares of O’Reilly fell approximately 13% in 2017. The 2017 share price decline was primarily the result of price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple contraction driven by fears of Amazon ramping up its auto parts offerings, and a corresponding industry-wide slowdown in sales for traditional auto-parts retailers. However, we believe the softness in sales was unrelated to Amazon’s activities in the market but was due to other factors, namely two years of mild summer and winter weather and slower growth in miles driven following two years of above-average growth. In addition, the decline in new car sales during the 2008-11 period may have also adversely impacted auto parts sales in 2017, as cars manufactured during 2008-11 would normally be entering their prime aftermarket auto parts consumption phase.

We anticipate a better year for auto parts sales in 2018 driven by more normal weather patterns, and we estimate miles driven will increase by about 1% against an easier comparison.

Overall, we believe the investment story for O’Reilly remains compelling. With a better industry sales environment, we expect the company to post solid same-store sales growth over the upcoming years. The company continues to see margins expand as a result of better vendor pricing, more stores and a shift to private label products. The stock trades at a below-market multiple of 16 times our estimate of 2018 earnings, and we believe the company can grow its earnings per share at a mid-teens or a better compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over the next five years.

With the number and severity of U.S. natural disasters in 2017, how have the insurance companies in the Fund been impacted?

The direct impact of the hurricanes and Northern California fires on Markel Corp., the insurance underwriter we own in the Fund, appears to be small. Even after including our estimate of the impact on earnings of the fires in Southern California (which the company has yet to report), we believe the company should remain well-capitalized and easily be able to cover its underwriting losses with interest income, dividends, and gains from its investment portfolio. Aon PLC, as a broker of insurance products, was not affected directly by the natural disasters. In a counter-intuitive twist, we actually expect our insurance investments to be net beneficiaries of the large losses suffered by the industry this past year as they should benefit directly from the price increases thought to be in the works for 2018 as reinsurers try to recoup their 2017 losses during the annual January 1 reinsurance renewals just recently completed.

Can you share your outlook for the coming year?

S&P Index earnings are expected to increase by about 14% in 2018; nine percentage points from core growth and five percentage points from lower taxes. And while we may not see valuations rise as much as they did in 2017, this rate of earnings growth is quite good. We believe the holdings in the Fund should produce attractive earnings growth in this environment as they benefit from improving economic growth in the U.S.

Current and future holdings are subject to risk.